How to Prematurely Evaluate a Head Coach Hiring

With about two and half weeks now passed since the Pelicans announced that Alvin Gentry, the lead assistant coach for the newly crowned NBA champion Golden State Warriors, would be the team’s next head coach, there has been sufficient time to gauge the reaction to the hire from the fan base. Overall, the response has been a relatively calm one, and that fact should not be taken lightly. A more uneducated group of NBA fans would simply look at the easiest stat to pull – Gentry’s career win/loss record – and start blasting the hire, ignoring any circumstances that surrounded his prior head coaching stints. Learning more about coaching history and reputation takes only a surprisingly small level of digging, but results in exponential returns from an information perspective. The vast majority of Pelicans Nation realizes the value of even five minutes of well-directed research, and quite frankly, that is awesome.

It is Okay to Disagree

Allow me to be clear – it is completely justifiable to be unsatisfied with the hire of Gentry, as some certainly are, especially given the unusually high number of quality coaches who were potentially available this offseason. The key, of course, is to support that position with reason and facts. For example, take a look at argument A and B below, both of which have been voiced on more than one occasion:

A) The Pelicans have ranked in the bottom third of the NBA in defensive rating for the last three years, and yet they hired an offensive-minded coach who has never led an above-average defense when much stronger defensive coaches like Jeff Van Gundy and Tom Thibodeau were available.

B) The Pelicans hired a coach with a sub-.500 career head coaching record instead of more expensive options with better track records because Gentry was cheap and would be highly unlikely to clash with Dell Demps over roster management issues.

I would jump at the chance to have a Pelicans-related discussion with the person defending argument A, as this person’s concerns are clear and fair. On the other hand, I weep for the person making argument B, because those complaints are nothing more than conjectures. Ideally, I can begin to convince those making the first argument that Gentry was a solid choice. Most people defending the second argument are beyond help, and any attempts to educate them would likely be futile.

“The Homer Test”

I made my best effort at squashing concerns over Gentry’s win-loss record on Twitter soon after the hire, but my justification is far from enough to create an irrefutable case on its own. A quick test I like to do whenever I am worried that I may be irrationally supporting my favorite team is to turn to the work and opinions of neutral NBA analysts who know far more about the NBA than myself:

Screenshot 2015-06-07 at 3.17.08 PM

The result of doing so in this particular scenario appears pretty straight forward. (Links to those tweets provided here, and many of these writers have also written more in-depth columns about the hiring.)

Note: if I missed any strong NBA writers who openly criticized the hire, please share it with me in the comments so I can be as inclusive as possible. I was simply unable to find any from my list of highly respected NBA analysts.

Why the Pelicans Hired Gentry

As we continue to evaluate and scrutinize the hiring decisions to greater degrees, it becomes increasingly simple to see that the New Orleans Pelicans settled on the next head coach for basketball reasons; not financial, not bureaucratic. By all accounts, Alvin Gentry aced his interviews with the team, and you can be sure that his proposal for his eventual coaching staff was a major selling point throughout the process. Gentry knows his reputation and his strengths, and immediately displayed the humility he’ll need to lead the Pelicans by moving to bring in a lead assistant with the defensive knowledge possessed by Darren Erman. The best teams in the NBA are led by a solid staff of coaches and a head coach who listens to them, not one head guy giving orders to his assistants and players. As such, Dell Demps did not hire Alvin Gentry in a vacuum; he hired a smart, highly-respected man who would assemble the best possible staff to help this Pelicans team soar to new heights.

And, of course, this kind of motivation and personality certainly doesn’t hurt:

[youtube id=”-auYzCs9YyI” width=”620″ height=”360″]

5 responses to “How to Prematurely Evaluate a Head Coach Hiring”

  1. Obviously to early to judge. But Gentry is winning youtube. In the last 48 hours he not only had his champagne drenched shout out to AD on national TV – he also managed a dunk (of sorts) at 60 yrs old in the lead up to the game.  what’s not to love.

  2. I am super happy to see how Dell and Alvin will work together. I was someone who was looking at VanGundy and I felt his passion for wanting to coach AD was the most obvious.  Not until I found out what alvin did to get this job. Coach Gentry  Was super prepared and clearly won the job with his vision for the team.  A vision that Dell Demps shares.

  3. At first I was kind of meh about the hire.

    But as I see more of him, the more I love.  He’s got a GREAT personality, swagger, character & coaching talent.  EVERYONE speaks very highly of him, he seems like a really funny guy and he runs an offense that makes for exciting basketball.

    Add to that the fact that he’s put together a staff that includes a brilliant young defensive mind (Ermann) and a players’ coach guard specialist (Pack) and I’m getting so optimistic I almost can’t stand my self.

    HURRY UP 2015-16 SEASON!

  4. Caffeinedisaster couldn’t agree more with this perspective. At first, I thought the hire was good; not great, but good. Everything that I have seen and heard since then (especially the Erman and Pack additions) has pushed my grade of the hire from B+ to A (and if we get Melvin Hunt too, then I’ll even go A+).

  5. I don’t really see how anyone could really have that strong of an opinion just from seeing the name of a coaching hire without looking into anything else, yet it seemed that the general reaction when Gentry was first hired was “meh.” When people asked me how I felt I said I had no idea because I don’t know enough about the guy, but that people were up in arms because they kept saying he was mediocre.
    From what I can tell, he coached in horrible organizations, was usually rebuilding, and when he had a decent team (Phoenix), he did well. From what I can tell he seems to be a great offensive mind whose teams play a thrilling pace of basketball.
    I’m excited.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.