The only thing that the chart comparing Burke/Augustin/Paul/Ford proves to me is that the difference between being all-time great PG and being average PG isn't physical ability it's skill, the capacity to improve on those skills, and the will to get the best out of those around you. Burke in his two years has shown he has those three qualities. Again it's crazy to think he ends up as good as Paul. Of course I would have said the same thing about Paul if you would have insisted he would be this good.
« Bourbon Street Shots NBA Draft Party – New Orleans Edition
Pelicans Beat: 5-on-5 on the NBA Draft »
Sixth Pick Tournament Semi-Finals: Trey Burke vs. Alex Len (Part II)
Part One featured opening arguments (in incredible rap battle style) for each prospect. Part two features a more comprehensive, detailed analysis and gives you the chance to vote for who you think should make it to the finals of the sixth pick tournament.
The Case for Trey Burke (Mason)
The big guns came out last week as Trey Burke took down C.J. McCollum in the second round of this tournament. Almost everything that anyone would need to know in regards to why there is no better pick for the Pelicans than Mr. Burke can be found by simply following that link. I’ll rehash the most essential points in a bit, but what’s most important first is to explain why drafting Len could be a franchise crippling mistake.
Injury Risk. This concern should by far be the most off-putting one for NBA teams. Len recently had surgery to repair a stress fracture in his ankle, sidelining him for up to six months. Though never quite this serious, ankle injuries have been a common theme for Len according to NBADraft.net. As has been seen plenty of times in the past, ankle and foot injuries are very scary problems, especially for seven footers. It’s difficult to look at his injury woes and not think about someone like Yao, whose career was drastically shortened as a result.
Inability to create for himself. While Len is a strong offensive rebounder, he isn’t someone who you can just give the ball to in the post and expect him to score routinely. He doesn’t have a strong post game, and he’s no better facing the rim, either. According to Synergy Sports, he was a pretty average scorer in the post against single coverage, which is far from ideal for a guy who people hope will become an all-star caliber center.
Limited range. If Len and Davis were to make up the Pelicans’ starting front court, you can expect Davis to be the screener in a large majority of these plays, because Len is limited to only finishing at the rim. He doesn’t have much range on his jumper, so he’ll really struggle to stretch the defense even as much as Robin Lopez did for the Hornets last season.
Weak lower body. Though he has strong shot blocking skills, Len doesn’t have a very strong base, which will allow bigger opponents to back him down in the paint fairly easily. This weakness could also explain why he was a much better offensive rebounder than defensive rebounder, as match-ups were often able to achieve better position with their core strength advantage.
Laziness in the paint. All too often, Len appears to think that his sheer size edge will be all he needs to succeed around the rim, especially from a rebounding perspective. Even if his strength weren’t a concern, he would still have to be physical in order to pull down as many boards and be as dominant on defense as he should. Playing in this way is often a motor issue and not something that can be taught; Len may be an exception, but it’s not a gamble worth taking.
Struggles to draw fouls. This past season, Len averaged just 4 free throws per game, a pretty disappointing number given his size and agility. For comparison’s sake, Cody Zeller averaged nearly twice as many free throws per game (7.2) despite just three more minutes played. Most dominant offensive big men are good at getting to the free throw line, which is a skill that Len simply does not possess.
Len certainly has his positives, and the upside is there, but there are just too many inherent risks associated with drafting him to be comfortable doing so with the sixth overall pick.
None of the previously mentioned risks about Len are present in his semi-finals opponent. Trey Burke is one of the safest picks in the draft, almost certain to be no worse than a solid starting PG for years to come. So why does he make the most sense for the Pelicans?
- Care for the basketball. One of the most incredible things about Burke was the amount of ways in which he could positively impact a game (frequently against stellar competition) while keeping his turnover rate so amazingly low. Most guys like that take a lot of chances, so even the best get burned sometimes. Not Trey. His control of the ball and the whole game is unbelievable, and he’s a guy that can be completely trusted as a team’s floor general. He had an assist/turnover ratio of over 3!
Measurables. If Tuesday’s rap battle was any indication, Michael will likely harp heavily on Burke’s lack of size. Listen, the guy measured in at 6 foot 1 ½ inches at the combine and he has a 6’5” wingspan. Those measurements are totally fine for a point guard in the NBA. In fact, the heights of the starting point guards of the other Southwest Division teams last year are 6’0” (Collison – DAL), 6’1” (Conley – MEM), 6’2” (Parker – SA), and 6’3” (Jeremy Lin – HOU). Would Burke’s height really be a detriment against any of those guys?
Pick & Roll with Anthony Davis. Absolute devastation for opponents for years to come, since neither one of those guys can even legally drink alcohol yet. Putting the best pick and roll point guard in the NCAA last season with one of the most athletic big men in the NBA will be really dangerous, sure to go places Greivis and AD never could.
- Low risk meets great need. As noted above, Burke is quite possibly the only pick in this draft that will guarantee a team a starting caliber player for an extended period of time. While a couple others may have more upside, every single other guy has bigger question marks than Burke. As it so happens, the Pelicans are still looking for their point guard of the future (even if Rivers keeps improving, it is unlikely that he will ever fill that role), and Burke is the guy for the job. Trey puts up big numbers, his team wins games, and he doesn’t get hurt. In its simplest form, what else is really necessary?
Again, for more on Burke, my piece on the second round victory over C.J. McCollum will tell you everything you need to know. That being said, here’s the bottom line – when the core of an argument for not drafting a player is solely connected to his size while ignoring everything he has already accomplished on the basketball court, it’s really shouldn’t even be taken seriously. Burke is a stud, and he’s proved it with his all around game consistently. Passing on him for a raw seven footer with lingering ankle problems wouldn’t just be a mistake; it would be asinine.
The Case for Alex Len (Pellissier)
The easiest trap to fall into as a Pelicans fan is comparing Trey Burke to Chris Paul, because their descriptions are so similar: quick, undersized guards with a penchant for balancing scoring and facilitating. Competitors. Winners. But are these comparisons a product of talent similarities, or our experience with Paul in New Orleans?
Here is a screenshot of a list of strengths from DraftExpress. Read them and try to figure out whether the player being described is Chris Paul or Trey Burke. Don’t cheat!
Answer: Neither! That was a list of strengths for DJ Augustin, and they are eerily similar to the descriptions of Paul and Burke coming out of college. In fact, let’s take a look at a table comparing some guards and their athletic scores/sizes at the combine.
|Height w/o Shoes||5′ 11.75″||5′ 10″||5′ 11.75″||5′ 11″|
|Height w/shoes||6′ 1.25″||5′ 11.5″||6′ 1″||6′ 0.25″|
|Wingspan||6′ 5.5″||6′ 3.5″||6′ 4.25″||5′ 11.5″|
|Standing Reach||8′ 1.5″||7′ 10.5″||7′ 9″||7′ 9.5″|
|No Step Vert||29.5||28.5||32.0||32.5|
|3/4 Court Sprint||3.16||3.07||3.22||3.20|
All of these players were fantastic in college, but the NBA is a different animal, and size concerns are, well, concerning. Augustin still hasn’t panned out and Ford is out of the league. “But Burke was player of the year! That won’t happen to him.” Well, here is a list of the 10 players who preceded Burke as Naismith winners.
|2003||T. J. Ford||Texas||Guard||Sophomore|
|2004||Jameer Nelson||Saint Joseph’s||Guard||Senior|
|2006||J. J. Redick||Duke||Guard||Senior|
|2008||Tyler Hansbrough||North Carolina||Forward||Junior|
|2010||Evan Turner||Ohio State||Guard||Junior|
|2011||Jimmer Fredette||Brigham Young||Guard||Senior|
There is a trend from this table. Besides Evan Turner, all of the athletically gifted/properly sized players (in green) have made excellent transitions to the NBA. But take a closer look at the guards, and you’ll notice another trend: the ones whose athleticism or size were underwhelming haven’t been stars in the NBA. This kind of data must not be used as a damning and final criticism of Burke, but rather, it should be used to illustrate that amazing college production doesn’t always translate. I would be a fool to say Burke won’t be good in the NBA because Ford busted, Augustin hasn’t panned out, etc. Each player is a unique case, and there is value in grabbing a player like Redick, who is an excellent role player. But Chris Paul was a super-special talent, and you shouldn’t assume that Burke will be the same kind of player just because they have similarities.
Know who else had an amazing will to win? Tyler Hansbrough. Hansbrough averaged 20 points and 9 rebounds in college, was a consensus All-American three times, won AP Player of the Year, Naismith College Player of the Year, and also won a national title. Now? He’s coming off the bench for the Indiana Pacers. He brings value to their team, sure, but he isn’t a star player, and it’s not because he’s not a “winner” or because “he doesn’t want it more than the other guy.” Hansbrough seemingly has a bloody nose every game. He hustles and sacrifices his body every minute he’s on the floor. He’s not a star because the competition he’s facing is so talented.
The NBA is absolutely stacked at point guard right now. In no particular order, here are some of the players Burke will be facing if he’s a starter: Derrick Rose, Chris Paul, Jrue Holiday, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Damian Lillard, Stephen Curry, Russell Westbrook, Kyrie Irving, Tony Parker, Mike Conley, John Wall, Ty Lawson, and Kyle Lowry. These guys can all flat-out play, and there are plenty of other solid point guards out there as well. Most of these guys are also still very young. Next year’s draft crop will likely bring Marcus Smart and Andrew Harrison into the fold as well. NBA Draft analysts aren’t even sure that, in what many consider a weak draft, Trey Burke is the best point guard.. and you expect him to blow away the NBA against the aforementioned players?
Look, I like Burke. He’s a smart, skilled, and quick guard, and there is absolutely value in his skill sets. He will have a place in this league. But if you are expecting a perennial All-Star, I suggest you adjust your expectations, because I don’t see it happening. The level of competition at point guard is just too stiff, and with the #6 pick, I want a difference-maker.
Enter Alex Len, whom the Cleveland Cavaliers are rumored to be considering at the number 1 spot. I already pointed out last article that Jonathan Givony of DraftExpress has Len at #1 in his rankings. He might not even be there if we draft, but if he is (and that’s the point of this tournament!!!!!!!), I think it’s imperative that we take him. Here’s why.
1. Monty loves him. You don’t have to watch his interview from the workout that closely to notice that Monty Williams is infatuated with the idea of drafting Alex Len. I have said this time and time again: Len needs polish, but he is ahead of the curve. Williams reinforces this by saying:
“I like him on film, though. That’s what I tend to- I know more about him as a player just watching him on film- he can do a lot of stuff on the floor that a lot of young bigs can’t at this point in their career. ”
I’ve said it in previous articles: if you are 7’1 and have long arms, you can impact the game around the rim on defense. Some of the best shot-blockers in the NBA are average or poor athletes (Brook Lopez, Roy Hibbert), but they have considerable size, and that allows them to alter shots at the rim.
3. Ability to defend the perimeter
This is the quality Len possesses that makes him so rare. Small-ball is effective because behemoth centers are very rarely capable of defending away from the basket. Len slides well laterally, can hedge on pick and rolls, and can still recover to the basket quickly.
4. Here’s a video that showcases a lot of things Len is able to do, and I have a few remarks right under the video that you should consider while viewing it. I marked the times, and barring some strange inconsistency in the video, you should be able to find the occurrences.
0:33- dribbles right, defender overplays right hand, so Len spins/dunks.
1:05- puts ball on the floor versus James McAdoo, a 6’8 tweener forward known for his quickness. McAdoo is an NBA-quality athlete.
1:56- immediately recognizes double-team, hits open shooter on the opposite side of the court.
2:05- again gets doubled, passes out of post to open shooter
2:18- catches ball over Nerlens Noel, one dribble to spin, finishes with soft touch. Notice how quickly he executes the spin. Few 7 footers can move like that. It requires a level of coordination, fluidity, and quickness that most guys his size don’t have.
2:35- signature Tim Duncan bank shot.
2:39- again, a signature Tim Duncan move.
It is very clear that he has taken things from Duncan’s game and tried to emulate them. I’m not saying Len is Duncan 2.0, but the fact that Len is already working on those facets of his game excites me. When asked who he’d compare himself to, he responded: “I actually don’t like to compare myself to anyone. But I really like watching what Tim Duncan is doing right now.” Expectations must be realistic, and Len has work to do in order to polish his game, but he’s got an excellent skill level for someone his size and age.
5. “..but Len can’t contribute right away!”
This is a misconception. Athletic bigs who can finish at the rim can fit on offense. Andre Drummond made 29% of his free throws in college and can’t hit a jumper to save his life, yet he just averaged 14 points per 36 minutes in his rookie season in the NBA. Len is not as athletic as Drummond, but he has a far superior touch and is big enough to do the same sort of offensive duties. The Pelicans use the pick and roll frequently, and Len has the size, mobility, and athleticism to step in right away and contribute in that area.
Here are Drummond’s stats in his year at UConn versus Alex Len’s from last season at the University of Maryland via Hoop-Math.
|Player||FGA||TS%||%Shots at Rim||FG% at Rim||%Asst’d at Rim||FTA/FGA||FT%|
6. “He’s not aggressive enough!”
Len’s Maryland teammates didn’t feed him the ball, but from the games I saw, he was working hard to get good position in the post, and when he didn’t get the ball, he didn’t mope, he went to go set a screen. Len is not a diva and he works hard. If his guards don’t feed him the ball, it’s not his fault. It’s not like he can take the ball up the floor himself. I’m more concerned with whether he’s working hard, and he was.
I don’t think Burke will be a bad NBA player by any means, but the CP3 comparisons have to stop. College basketball is a much different game, and Burke is more like Cliff Paul than Chris Paul. I think that Alex Len is a perfect fit next to Anthony Davis: he can protect the rim, rebound, run the floor, and finish at the rim. He also shows promise in his mid-range jumper and should be able to stretch the floor with a little polish.
..and finally, here is a GIF I made from Dell Demps’ interview during the workout. The transition from smile to frown comes when a reporter asks him about Burke. Okay, so actually, it just happens because he knows he can’t talk about what he thinks of Burke during the interview. I just thought it was funny how quickly his face changed.
Huh. This is a tough one. It might be nice to think of each's ceiling - and I think Len has a HIGH ceiling - but picking 6th may be a choice of who has the higher floor. In that case, I vote for Burke, simply because he may never be a star, but he would probably be a very good backup PG in worst case. Len's worst case is constant injury DNP. And we can't win games with guys on the bench ...
It would be fascinating, though, to see what Monty could do with a few years of coaching Len and Davis together. That *might* give us an NBA-best interior defense, even if we give up lots of threes.
Trey Burke is no Chris Paul, but at least his rise is because of what he did on the court. Regarding Alex Len, Mike Mamula:NFL Draft::Alex Len:NBA draft. The only difference between the two is that Mamula rose because of his workouts. Len's rise has nothing to do with anything he ever did. The only reason he is rated so highly is because of Roy Hibbert's success in the Eastern Conference Finals against Miami. It's like McNamara said, everybody is overreacting to one player's success against the Big 3, and now everybody has to have their "Roy Hibbert." And who is the highest rated seven-footer in this draft? Alex Len. So, by default, he is the next "Roy Hibbert," so now everybody has to have him. He meteorically rises, and everybody is exaggerating every perceived strength that he has as a player.
voted for len....like i said....even last year....i still believe that austin rivers is the PG of the future for the pels....be patient
I'm not even worried about Len's little procedure... I would flat out rather have Burke... and I'm a Rivers believer. However I think that Rivers needs more seasoning and would love to have Burke running the point and in a couple years Rivers turning into a Jason Terry type 6th man role (but way better D-fence).. which I think is his destiny!
I agree that there are waaaay more quality PGs in the league.. but I think Burke will be a top 3 player from this draft!
I see a lot of fears about his ankle and worries that it will be chronic. Yet, I have heard a lot of McCollum talk in the 6th pick tournament and nobody has ever brought up worries about his foot. Not even my opponents.
McCollum missed games. Len hasn't. He decided to have an offseason procedure, just like dozens of NBA players do every year, and he will be back before the season starts.
People have fears because of Oden and Smits, Big Z, Sampson, etc. but how many hundreds of big men had injuries and they weren't chronic? Why are we so afraid of the exception, rather than the rule? And if we are scared of the exception, why not be scared of McCollum? There have been plenty of guards who get hurt, then hurt again and again.
It is just a poor argument, which as most of you know, is the only thing that really bothers me. Plenty to worry about with Len. This shouldn't be one of those things IMO.
I don't really want either guy, but Burke is the better of the two choices. At least I don't worry about Burke's ankle, or Burke showing things at the NBA level he couldn't do in college. These are things I have to worry about with Len.
I just hope that in the final round, the writers try to build up their players than tear their opponent down. I love the whole draft matchup thing but I honestly come away remembering more of the negatives than the positives a lot of the time.
Since Len is taking this round I can't wait to see Oladipo vs Len. I wonder if all these Len supporters will disappear? The arguments will be epic.
My 2 cents -- Michael made a REALLY great case for himself, saying and showing stuff I didn't think about Len. Most of his arguments against Burke are already things I've thought about.
But I wouldn't be over the moon picking any of these two
The argument made me pick Burke.I have seen him play. D.J. Augustin is no Trey Burke, that was a weak joke. Len has injury issues. We should not draft based on flashes in the pan and huge upside. Burke is consistent with upside which makes him the better pick.
I honestly don't want either of those guys after reading this, but I went with Len due to the fact that bigs are hard to come by and there is a number of PGs that can be had via trade, FA, or next year's draft (Marcus Smart!) who I believe will fare better than Burke. I'd even take MCW or CJ McCollum before I take Burke. Not trying to hate on him, I just think there are better options.
I went Burke, but this one was really tough. They both bring some amazing talents to the table and I think that they both fit the team really well. Honestly I couldn't make up my mind so I just went with my gut. It tells me that Burke is going to thrive in this league and that Len is going to be hurt.
i'm sorry but in spite of the excellent case made for len here, I can not get past the foot.
7footer + foot / ankle concerns = no thanks
voted for burke
Alex Len is the guy for me. He can do a little bit of everything. He is great around the rim and can shoot a little bit. He makes good passes and can help with ball movement. He can be a rim protector, a rebounder. He can take pressure off Davis. He is not a liability in the pick and roll. DraftExpress likes him. Monty likes him. Dell likes him. I like him.
Len can help this team have something that other teams don't. 2 long, athletic big men that can play. We need to zig when others zag. Finding guys like Burke isn't that hard. Finding a guy like Len is. I really hope he's available and we pick him. (I also predicted him to be our pick on the night of the lottery.)
Solid write-up. Compelling cases for both...and I took Burke.
To me, the modern NBA is a game of speed and attack that's dominated by wing players (Bron, Wade, Durant, Kobe) or ball-handling point guards who can create for others and for themselves (Rose, Parker, Paul). To use an NFL analogy, in a QB league, you better have a good QB or you're going nowhere.
That means that the Pelicans need a quality PG if the expect to go anywhere in the future. Combine that with the presence of Anthony Davis and I gotta go with Burke over Len.
Unless the Cavs are dumb enough to take Gordon's contract you might laugh at this and the Pels take Waiters, Varijao's contract and the no.1 pick yeah but lets stop living in an bizaro world.
Love Len's quickness and the way he dunks with his arms still bent on the way up. (Like a T-Rex, lol)
Burke has way too much competition in the NBA at the point. If Len didn't have an ankle injury, I'd be 100% on him.
Big men still have trade value with injury problems. Philly gave up Iggy, Harkless, Vucevic to get Bynum.
I know I have written my fair share of 6th pick tournament pieces this year, so I am knocking myself when I say this - This is the best piece of the entire tournament. Wow! Great arguments guys. I hope people read every word, walk away and think about it, come back and read again, and then vote.
Awesome, awesome, awesome stuff!
@lsucpolk Everyone is overreacting to Roy Hibbert, but GMs have salivated over 7 footers long before Roy Hibbert learned how to tie his shoes. It's nothing new
We aren't supposed to argue for our guys in the comments, so I can't address your points about Len at the moment
@Michael McNamara Cause he plays for Nagihcim!
@Houpgarou The foot is my ONLY issue with him.
@Papa Pelican the entire tournament is based on the presumption that these players are on the board when our pick is up. It doesn't matter where we think they fall
@Michael McNamara Indeed this is one of the highlights of this tournament. I'm left unsure how to vote.
@yaboytonez I was surprised by how easily he won over McCollum. This battle here doesn't surprise me as much.
@yaboytonez He didn't miss any games with this injury. Basically, he is having an offseason procedure; something half the league does when their year comes to a close.
@yaboytonez Just wanted to add 1 little tidbit: Oden's legs weren't the same size. One leg was longer than the other, and that was the same red flag Sullinger had last year.
If you read my statement I myself said he didn't workout because he was injured. Your statement have any other point other than redundancy?
I've heard him being called injury prone. How long does this injury keep him out? 4-6 months? Same analysts argued Odens' injury wouldn't matter. I am overly weary of 7 footers with injuries.
@yaboytonez Because I listen to Chad Ford's comments that he hears that doctors aren't worried about Len's injury like they are with Noel's.
What past history?
@yaboytonez He didn't work out because he's still in the boot. Kinda hard to play ball in one.
So why didn't he work out? Its because he's injured. So how can you say he won't have setbacks or sustain more injuries. His current state and past injury history disagree with you.