I'll be a little contrary just to elucidate the issue. Is it the case that if opposing teams are routinely giving Pels shooters wide open looks from 15-18ft, they should pass on the shots? Has the NBA progressed to where what was formerly a cardinal sin--leaving shooters open for good shots--is now a organized defensive strategy to bait the opposing team? I understand the importance of the three ball, but nailing 18-footers should cause the defense to rotate at some point as well, creating driving lanes. It may sound simplistic, but I just think we aren't finishing at the rim and are not shooting well enough early in the season. Our high 3-pt percentage could be a function of not jacking up a lot of junk heaves from behind the arc.
« The Social Media Squawk: Numero Uno
3 Point Share
I was perusing nba.com/stats today and I stumbled upon an alarming statistic. The Pelicans are 2nd to last in field goal percentage in the restricted area, shooting a paltry 51.3%. A team with Eric Gordon, Anthony Davis, and Tyreke Evans should be nowhere near last in this regard. Davis is one of the league’s most talented finishers at the rim and Gordon and Evans are known for their ability to get to the basket. Yet the statistics speak volumes about the offense right now. Quite simply, teams are collapsing on the Pelicans’ penetration and the team is resorting to taking mid-range jumpers. Sometimes it’s working and sometimes it’s not, but it has looked ugly, to say the least.
Ryan Schwan addressed this at length in last night’s podcast with Michael McNamara and you can listen to it here.
Here is the data that I had to work with.
|Team||Percentage of Shots from 3||Restricted Area FG%|
|Los Angeles Clippers||30%||66.5%|
|San Antonio Spurs||22%||63.6%|
|Golden State Warriors||32%||60.2%|
|New York Knicks||29%||57.0%|
|Portland Trail Blazers||28%||55.5%|
|Los Angeles Lakers||30%||54.9%|
|Oklahoma City Thunder||23%||54.6%|
|New Orleans Pelicans||15%||51.3%|
It’s hard to sift through all of that information and derive anything meaningful by just glancing at it, so here is an Excel scatterplot (complete with a trendline) that shows the data.
See that little square in the lower left corner all by himself? That’s the New Orleans Pelicans, who shoot a league low 14.7 percentage of their field goal attempts from 3 point land.
14.7 freaking percent in an NBA era where teams have all but accepted that the 3 point shot is necessary to create the kind of offense that succeeds in today’s game. To put that in perspective, that is 2.5 standard deviations from the mean team percentage of 25.3%.
That’s the purpose of this article- not to highlight that there is an unmistakable relationship between all teams’ rates of 3 pointers to their ability to finish close to the basket, but to highlight that Pelicans are taking so few 3s relative to the rest of the league.
Does personnel factor in? Sure. Most NBA small forwards have some capacity to hit 3 pointers, and Al Farouq Aminu has cut out that part of his game. Tyreke Evans is a poor shooter and Gordon’s best asset is his ability to attack the basket, though he has shown that he is capable of hitting 3s in catch and shoot situations. Davis and Jason Smith don’t shoot 3s, and Greg Stiemsma and Lance Thomas barely even take shots, period. Jrue Holiday and Brian Roberts do a lot of ball-handling, thereby limiting their spot-up opportunities. Ryan Anderson is injured. But there is no excuse to be shooting this low a percentage: the nearest team is the Memphis Grizzlies (known for their terrible perimeter shooting), and they are a full 4 percent higher.
I’m not saying we need to start jacking 3s like the Houston Rockets and the Golden State Warriors, but it is undoubtedly true that the Pelicans’ extremely low volume of 3 pointers taken is having an effect on the offense, particularly in the field goal percentage in the restricted area. And it’s not like they haven’t been successful when they shoot either.. the Pelicans lead the league in 3 point percentage at 43.8%. Ryan Anderson’s return will do wonders for volume, as he can hoist 3s in a moment’s notice and takes a very high volume of 3 pointers, but this team needs to start taking more 3s with or without him.. and it needs to start doing it now.
This is exactly where I disagree with Michael on this. To think that professional basketball players can't shoot a certain amount of three's is absurd. While I get that the roles the players have may mitigate their ability to shoot 3's to a certain extent, I think that the Pelicans have now passed that into the ridiculous.
This is where Michael is right though. This team has poor basketball IQ and for some reason they love these mid-range shots. Defenses are giving them the shot and they are taking it because they all think they can hit it. The point is that they aren't making a concerted effort to shoot from three.
@New City You address a really good point- some NBA teams do bait others into taking those shots. Midrange shots have their place, but you need to be passing the ball into situations where 3 pointers are an option more if you're the Pelicans. I'm not advocating that we start jacking pull-up 3 pointers a la JR Smith. There are ways to create 3 point looks, and even if we aren't making them, they can create better spacing.
@jsgrayson I agree w/ you in that it is something that they should be able to do. I think Monty needs to design some plays to get 3s for guys like Roberts, Morrow.
It was also extremely confusing to read your argument agreeing w/ Michael (McNamara) in an article written by me (Michael).